Tuesday, May 29th, 2007...11:12 am
Oral Argument in Throop v. AirLog
Jump to Comments
The Supreme Court heard oral argument on April 20th, in Throop v. Air Logistics of Alaska, Inc. Gavel to Gavel describes the appeal as follows:
Both parties are appealing a trial court decision in this Alaska Wage and Hour Act case. The issues include: should overtime compensation be paid on hours worked or hours paid, and can the statute of limitations be extended by alleging a contract claim?
The oral argument is now available here.
Will Schendel and Dan Winfree represent the plaintiff employee class. Gregory Miller (Birch Horton) and Zane Wilson (Cook Schuhman & Groseclose) represent Defendant AirLog.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.