Saturday, March 15th, 2008...1:06 pm
Legal Miscellanea
“Employee” in EPLI policy: Where the employer-defendant reimbursed a third party for an individual’s work, the individual is not the “employee” of the employer-defendant for purposes of ELPI coverage when the policy defines “employee” as “any person who receives wages or a salary from the Entity for work that is directed and controlled by the Entity.” The coverage issue was decided under California law. Valley Imaging Partnership Medical Group LP v. RLI Ins. Co., 2008 WL 598343 (9th Cir. Mar. 5, 2008).
Update: Michael Fox at Jottings of an Employer’s Lawyer has comments and a link to the trial court opinion.
Legal writing - Bryan Garner: Garner will present a section on Advanced Legal Writing on the Friday morning segment of the Alaska Bar Convention, May 2nd. Garner and Eugene Volokh excell at teaching and practicing this skill. See E. Volokh, Academic Legal Writing, and B. Garner, The Winning Brief.
HIPAA violations and employment: UCLA Medical Center is firing 14 employees for unnecessarily viewing Britney Spears’ medical records.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.