The 9th Circuit has applied the “unilateral change doctrine” recognized set out in NLRB v. Katz, 369 U.S. 736 (1962), and held that CBA language providing that benefits “continued in effect” ”during” the term of the CBA doesn’t relieve the employer of the duty to bargain before terminating the benefits when the CBA expires. The benefits […]
This blog is directed toward the legal, HR, and union communities of Alaska. It is not intended to be advertising. Do not substitute information in this blog for legal advice. Consult with a qualified attorney if you seek legal advice.
We welcome contributions and comments related to Alaska employment law. If you wish to contribute a new post or comment on a current post, you must first register. To register, go to the "Register" link in the "Meta" section at the bottom of this sidebar. Once registered, submit your contribution or comment. We will promptly screen contributions and comments (only for relatedness and civility), and then post on the blog.
For ideas about new articles, go here.
© 2007 Alaska Employment Law. Powered by PressRow
