Three opinions from the Alaska Supreme Court this morning address issues of interest to employment or civil rights lawyers.
Property interest: In Heitz v. State, Op. No. 6407 (Alaska Aug. 28, 2009), the Court revisited what constitutes a “property interest” protected by State Due Process, and held that foster care reimbursement payments from the State are […]
Filed under Attorney fees, Due process, Rule 68/Offer of Judgment
This blog is directed toward the legal, HR, and union communities of Alaska. It is not intended to be advertising. Do not substitute information in this blog for legal advice. Consult with a qualified attorney if you seek legal advice.
We welcome contributions and comments related to Alaska employment law. If you wish to contribute a new post or comment on a current post, you must first register. To register, go to the "Register" link in the "Meta" section at the bottom of this sidebar. Once registered, submit your contribution or comment. We will promptly screen contributions and comments (only for relatedness and civility), and then post on the blog.
For ideas about new articles, go here.
© 2007 Alaska Employment Law. Powered by PressRow
