Entries Tagged as 'ADA'

Tuesday, May 6th, 2008

9th Cir: ADA “Regarded-as” Liability

If an employer evaluates an employee for a disability, or tries to accommodate a possible disability, will its actions boomerang and constitute evidence that it “regarded” the employee as disabled?  The 9th Circuit says, No.

That the County was aware of Magdaleno’s PTSD diagnosis, required him to submit to a psychological evaluation, and took steps to accommodate […]

Tuesday, April 1st, 2008

DAlaska: Disability Discrimination

Donald Bennett, a Deputy U. S. Marshal in Fairbanks, alleged that the government discriminated against him because of his disability (diabetes), after he failed an annual blood glucose test.  Because the Marshals Service had no appropriate light duty, Bennett took nine months of sick and annual leave.  Bennett sued under the Rehabilitation Act, the Back […]

Wednesday, March 19th, 2008

One More Thing I Just Learned

Association claims under the ADA: A 2005 Guidance from the EEOC addresses these questions:
1.  What is the association provision of the ADA and to whom does it provide protection?
2.  How close does the association or relationship with a person with a disability have to be for an individual to be protected by the association provision?
3.  […]

Friday, February 1st, 2008

Civil Rights of Assisted Living Residents

Judge Timothy Burgess has now published his earlier decision in which he rejected claims by a resident of Chugiak Senior Center that the Center’s failure to provide services greater than “assisted care” discriminated against the resident on the basis of her alleged disabilities.  The resident had pursued claims under the Alaska Assisted Living Homes Act, […]

Monday, January 21st, 2008

Freakonomics on the ADA

The New York Times Magazine for Sunday the 20th carried an article entitled “Unintended Consequences: Why do well-meaning laws backfire?” by the authors of Freakonomics, Stephen Dubner and Steven Levitt.   One example of such laws, they say, is the Americans with Disabilities Act, relying on the article in the Journal of Political Economy by Daron […]

Monday, January 14th, 2008

9th Cir: Directors of Non-Profit Group Are Not ADA or ADEA Employees

Sierra Nevada Community Access Television, Inc. broadcasts film produced by members of the public (including “aspiring Wayne Campbells”).  It is governed by an unpaid, volunteer Board of Directors.  When the Board fired its Executive Director, he sued under the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act.  The ED claimed that the […]

Friday, December 28th, 2007

9th Cir: En Banc Opinion on the ADA

The Ninth Circuit this morning issued its en banc opinion in Bates v. UPS, where United Parcel Service had imposed DOT hearing standards on all drivers, including those driving trucks below the DOT weight floor (10,001 pounds).  The court vacated the District Court’s injunction against UPS, and remanded for application of different legal standards, though […]

Friday, November 2nd, 2007

9th Cir: Two Recent Opinions on the ADA, DFR, and Title VII

Member claims against a union: The 9th Circuit has affirmed judgment against a union under both Title VII and DFR theories. 
DFR claim: The Court affirmed a trial court’s findings that a union had breached its duty by failing to file a timely grievance when the union has agreed to do so, and that such conduct substantially injured the […]

Tuesday, October 23rd, 2007

9th Cir: Recent Employment Opinions

ADA and alcoholism:  The 9th Circuit has affirmed summary judgment for an employer that fired an employee who failed an alcohol test during work hours.  The employee claimed discrimination based on his disability of alcoholism. 
The Court stated:
The evidence shows that Sierra terminated Daft for his misconduct, failing an alcohol test during work hours in violation […]

Wednesday, October 10th, 2007

DAlaska Denies Preliminary Injunction in ADA Title I Case

Judge Burgess: the Employee’s Intangible Losses are not Irreparable
Barbara Flory works at Wal-Mart in Anchorage as a greeter.  Because of pain, she requested accommodations, but Wal-Mart denied them.  She then filed disability discrimination charges against Wal-Mart, and shortly thereafter a Complaint in federal court. 
Flory filed her charges with the Anchorage Equal Rights Commission and the EEOC.  Neither agency has […]

Friday, September 14th, 2007

9th Circuit OKs Waiver of Future Federal Civil Rights Claims

Court of Appeals Affirms Judge Sedwick; Result may Differ under Alaska Law  
The City of Mesa, Arizona, required Christine Nilsson, an applicant for a police position, to waive any claims arising out of the City’s pending investigation of her background.  After she complied, the investigation proceeded and revealed an EEOC dispute with a previous employer, workers comp claims, […]

Monday, July 16th, 2007

Refusal to extend lunch break violated the ADA

In EEOC v. Convergys Customer Management Group, Inc., the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals denied the employer’s motion for judgment as a matter of law, after a jury awarded a disabled employee back wages and other compensatory damages of approximately $115,000. The employee was fired for being late too many times, due to the fact […]

Wednesday, June 27th, 2007

Bill to Reverse Ledbetter

George Miller (D-Cal) has introduced HR 2831, which would amend Title VII, the ADEA, the ADA, and the 1973 Rehabilitation Act  to specify that unequal pay claims accrue with each paycheck.  If enacted, the bill would be retroactive to May 28, 2007, the day before the Supreme Court issued Ledbetter v. Goodyear.

Friday, May 25th, 2007

EEOC Guidance on Caregivers’ Rights

On Wednesday, May 23rd, the EEOC issued a
Guidance on discrimination against caregivers under Title VII, the ADA, and the FMLA.  The agency summarizes:

Although the federal EEO laws do not prohibit discrimination against caregivers per se, there are circumstances in which discrimination against caregivers might constitute unlawful disparate treatment. The purpose of this document is to assist […]

Thursday, May 24th, 2007

The ADA and The Exxon Valdez

One of the factors in assessing the “reprehensibility” of a tortfeasor’s conduct, when setting punitive damages, is whether the conduct was intentionally malicious or a mere accident.  In addressing this factor, the 9th Circuit, in In re The Exxon Valdez, 2007 WL 1490455 *22 (9th Cir. May 23, 2007), responded to Exxon’s ADA defense as […]