Employment lawyers often litigate whether a defendant may require a discrimination plaintiff to undergo a Rule 35 psychological examination. The parties to a pending Alaska discrimination case have resolved that issue among themselves by means of an interesting stipulation.
Donte Kelly sued Matanuska Electric Association, Inc. for racial harassment and retaliation, under both federal law (Title VII […]
Filed under 1981, Title 18, IIED, NIED, Rule 35 examination
This blog is directed toward the legal, HR, and union communities of Alaska. It is not intended to be advertising. Do not substitute information in this blog for legal advice. Consult with a qualified attorney if you seek legal advice.
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Dec | ||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
| 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
| 27 | 28 | 29 | ||||
We welcome contributions and comments related to Alaska employment law. If you wish to contribute a new post or comment on a current post, you must first register. To register, go to the "Register" link in the "Meta" section at the bottom of this sidebar. Once registered, submit your contribution or comment. We will promptly screen contributions and comments (only for relatedness and civility), and then post on the blog.
For ideas about new articles, go here.
© 2007 Alaska Employment Law. Powered by PressRow
